Doctor in Gujarat refuses to treat pregnant woman in her 30s. Discover why.

The Vadodara gynaecologist recently generated online discussion by sharing that he had refused treatment to a pregnant woman in her thirties who had declined essential tests. He stressed the doctor’s right to refuse care when patients attempt to dictate treatment plans. Dr. Rajesh Parikh highlighted this point, stating that just as patients have the right to choose their doctors, doctors have the right to refuse treatment, except in emergencies. The doctor recounted a situation where he had turned away a patient who was unwilling to undergo important tests, despite his efforts to persuade her otherwise.

He mentioned advising her to seek a doctor who would accommodate her misconceptions. Dr. Parikh emphasized the gravity of allowing patients to dictate treatment, particularly for obstetricians, warning that it is the doctor who will face potential consequences in court. Online responses to the doctor’s actions varied. One user suggested that patients often suspect doctors of recommending tests to receive financial kickbacks.

Another user expressed understanding of the patient’s lack of trust in the medical industry. A third user supported the doctor’s decision, citing the potential legal repercussions if the patient gave birth to a child with Down syndrome. Others recommended documenting patient refusals to safeguard against future issues and applauded the doctor for standing firm in his decision to refuse treatment, emphasizing the potential legal liabilities that doctors may face if patients turn against them.