Refusal of Treatment by Gujarat Doctor on Pregnant Woman in Her 30s: The Reason behind It

The Vadodara gynaecologist’s decision to decline treatment for a pregnant patient in her thirties who refused essential tests has sparked online discussion. He emphasized a doctor’s right to refuse care when patients try to dictate treatment plans, stating that doctors have the right to refuse treatment, except in emergencies. In a subsequent tweet, the doctor shared that he turned away the patient as she was not willing to undergo crucial tests. He emphasized the importance of not letting the patient dictate the treatment/management, as the doctor would be the one facing the consequences in court, not the patient.

Some users supported the doctor’s actions, suggesting that patients often feel doctors only prescribe tests to earn commissions, and emphasizing the need for doctors to document everything that happens to protect themselves from future issues. One user praised the doctor for refusing treatment, recognizing the potential legal ramifications if the patient later turned against him. Overall, the discussion highlights the complex dynamics between patients and doctors, as well as the legal and ethical considerations involved in refusing treatment or tests. The doctor’s stance has sparked a range of opinions and considerations on the matter.