No Different Treatment: Investigative Agency Argues in Arvind Kejriwal Case

The court recently heard arguments for the grant of interim bail for Delhi Chief Minister, Arvind Kejriwal. The court noted that Kejriwal is the “elected Chief Minister” of Delhi and acknowledged the extraordinary circumstances of the upcoming elections in the national capital.

The court also observed that Kejriwal is not a habitual offender and emphasized that if elections were not taking place, there would be no question of interim bail. However, the court also voiced concerns about Kejriwal’s potential involvement in governance issues if he were to be released, particularly in light of the accusations made by the Enforcement Directorate regarding his role in formulating the liquor excise policy.

Kejriwal’s legal team stressed that he would not be dealing with the excise case and pointed to ongoing disputes between Delhi’s AAP government and the LG, alleging interference by the BJP. The Enforcement Directorate opposed bail, arguing that releasing the AAP leader would set a bad precedent and potentially demoralize the public.

The court acknowledged the timing of Kejriwal’s arrest just weeks before the 2024 Lok Sabha election and the argument that it was meant to disrupt his party’s election plans. Furthermore, the court noted that Kejriwal had evaded multiple summons prior to his arrest.

Acknowledging the objections raised, the court expressed its intention to hear arguments against interim bail. The court emphasized the importance of the larger picture and the potential impact of Kejriwal’s release on the public perception of politicians involved in crimes.

In conclusion, the court’s deliberations reflected a recognition of the complex circumstances surrounding Kejriwal’s case and the potential consequences of granting him interim bail.