What Caused the Failure of UPSC?

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is a constitutional body established under Article 315 of the Indian Constitution. It is responsible for conducting examinations and selecting candidates for various civil services positions within the Indian government. The civil services exam is considered one of the most prestigious and challenging tests globally. In addition to conducting examinations, the UPSC also gives advice on the quantum of punishment for deviant civil servants.

However, recent incidents of abuse and misuse of quota by a few candidates have led to public criticism, raising questions about the credibility of the examination process and the institution itself. Criticism has also been directed at the outdated system, pattern, and process of the UPSC examination. The lengthy duration of the examination process, outdated syllabus, and heavy reliance on factual knowledge have been highlighted as areas of concern. The system’s emphasis on memorization over understanding, critical thinking, and creativity has raised doubts about the suitability of selected candidates for public administration roles.

The unpredictability of the UPSC exams, lack of transparency in the evaluation process, and the need for the selection of competent and effective officers have pointed to the need for reform. Suggestions for improvement include fostering creativity, transparency, and a genuine understanding of the complexities of public service. Reforms may involve assessing practical skills, enhancing the Personality Test (interview round), and including dedicated sections on ethics, integrity, and governance in the examination. Furthermore, it is suggested that the UPSC should include representation from all services, consider marks awarded during training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy Of Administration, and discharge its duties regarding advising on punishment for deviant civil servants in a more timely and transparent manner.

Overall, the need for a faster, more transparent, and clearer procedure to instill public faith in the UPSC as an institution is emphasized.