Why Virat Kohli’s Dismissal Against KKR Was Not a No-Ball Explained

The dismissal of Virat Kohli during a match has incited debate and controversy. The decision deemed him out, despite a review by the RCB star, which also went in favor of the bowling team. This sequence of events has led to disagreement over whether Kohli deserved to be dismissed.

The third umpire’s ruling was based on technological assessment, which showed that Kohli was standing outside his crease. The impact between the ball and the bat occurred ahead of the body, and the delivery was deemed fair. Despite measurements indicating that the ball would have reached Kohli within the allowable height had he remained inside the crease, the decision could not be overturned in his favor.

Some argue that Kohli’s position outside the crease made him vulnerable to the delivery, while others question the rule governing the assessment of the ball’s height in relation to the popping crease. The debate centers on whether the rule effectively addresses the potential danger posed by a delivery like the one faced by Kohli. The nature of the debate raises questions about the application of rules in cricket, particularly in cases where technological assessment comes into play.

Despite differing opinions, the controversy surrounding Kohli’s dismissal underscores the complexity of decision-making in the sport.