Category: Patanjali

The court had come down heavily on the Patanjali founders during the previous hearing last week. It had also pulled up the Uttarakhand government for not acting against the Haridwar-based company. “We respect what you have done for yoga,” the bench said. The two have said they are ready to…

The court had come down heavily on the Patanjali founders during the previous hearing last week. It had also pulled up the Uttarakhand government for not acting against the Haridwar-based company. “We respect what you have done for yoga,” the bench said. The two have said they are ready to…

The court hearing last week saw a reprimand of the Patanjali founders and the Uttarakhand government for their actions. The bench acknowledged Patanjali’s contributions to yoga but questioned their attitudes and the dismissal of other medical systems in favor of Ayurveda. The court emphasized that the law applies to everyone…

The court’s recent admonishment of the Patanjali founders and the Uttarakhand government, for their lack of action against the Haridwar-based company, has caught public attention. The court expressed appreciation for Patanjali’s contributions to yoga but questioned the founders’ attitude and the disparagement of other medical systems. It emphasized the importance…

The court has come down heavily on the Patanjali founders during the previous hearing last week and also pulled up the Uttarakhand government for not taking action against the Haridwar-based company. The court expressed respect for what they have done for yoga but criticized their attitude and questioned why they…

The Supreme Court recently rejected Patanjali’s apology affidavits in a controversy involving the company’s misleading advertisements. The court was dissatisfied with what it perceived as insincere apologies from the company and its founders. During the proceedings, the court focused on Dr. Mithilesh Kumar, the Joint Director of the state’s Food…

The court severely criticized the Uttarakhand licensing authority for not taking action against Patanjali for an extended period and expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre’s response. The bench of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice A. Amanullah dismissed the apologies from Ramdev and Balkrishna as insincere and deliberate violations of undertaking. Senior…

The court recently criticized the Uttarakhand licensing authority for not taking any action against Patanjali for a significant period and stated its dissatisfaction with the Centre’s response. The court regarded the apology from Patanjali’s founders as insincere and suggested that they should face the consequences for violating court orders. Senior…

The Supreme Court has rejected Patanjali’s apology affidavits in a controversy involving misleading advertisements. A bench of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed dissatisfaction with the insincere apologies from the company and its founders. The court scrutinized Dr. Mithilesh Kumar, the Joint Director of the state’s Food and…

The court criticized the Uttarakhand licensing authority for not taking action against Patanjali and expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre’s response. The court deemed the apologies from Ramdev and Balkrishna to be insincere and deliberate violations of an undertaking. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Patanjali founders, read out the apologies…